By Paul W. Franks
Curiosity in German Idealism - not only Kant, yet Fichte and Hegel in addition - has lately constructed inside analytic philosophy, which characteristically outlined itself towards the Idealist culture. but one drawback is still in particular intractable: the Idealists' longstanding declare that philosophy needs to be systematic. during this paintings, the 1st evaluate of the German Idealism that's either conceptual and methodological, Paul W. Franks deals a philosophical reconstruction that's precise to the movement's personal instances and assets and, while, deeply proper to modern inspiration. on the centre of the ebook are a few missed yet severe questions on German Idealism: Why do Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel imagine that philosophy's major activity is the development of a process? Why do they believe that each a part of the program needs to derive from a unmarried, immanent and absolute precept? Why, briefly, needs to or not it's all or not anything? via shut exam of the foremost Idealists in addition to the missed figures who stimulated their examining of Kant, Franks explores the typical flooring and divergences among the philosophical difficulties that stimulated Kant and those who, in flip, encouraged the Idealists. the result's a characterisation of German Idealism that unearths its assets in addition to its pertinence - and its problem - to modern philosophical naturalism.
Read Online or Download All or Nothing PDF
Best philosophy books
Bergson a connu une carrière à los angeles fois brillante et traditionnelle : ancien élève de l’École normale supérieure, agrégé de philosophie, il devient professeur de lycée et soutient sa thèse, Essai sur les données immédiates de l. a. judgment of right and wrong, en 1889.
Mentre l’Europa è percorsa dai primi rivoli dell’Illuminismo, Vico lavora incessantemente alla redazione della Scienza nuova: analizzando il linguaggio, i miti, le leggi, cerca un sistema di conoscenza globale che permetta di indagare il rapporto tra l’uomo e il proprio passato.
German classicist's huge research of the origins of eu idea in Greek literature and philosophy. marvelous, commonly influential. contains "Homer's View of Man," "The Olympian Gods," "The upward push of the person within the Early Greek Lyric," "Pindar's Hymn to Zeus," "Myth and fact in Greek Tragedy," and "Aristophanes and Aesthetic feedback.
- Nietzsche's Philosophy of the Eternal Recurrence of the Same
- Philosophy Imprisoned: The Love of Wisdom in the Age of Mass Incarceration
- Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing
- Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense
- Dao Companion to Classical Confucian Philosophy
Additional info for All or Nothing
But this is nothing more than a promissory note that he lacks the resources to redeem. " To employ a term Leibniz used in criticism of Locke: Kant's Newtonian metaphysics of community is superadded to his Leibnizian metaphysics of substance. 28 So Kant has not succeeded in meeting the Monistic Demand. Nor has he succeeded in meeting the Dualistic Demand. Kant thinks that, unlike Newton, he can avoid the physicalization of theology. Like Newton and Gassendi before him, Kant rejects Descartes' version of the ontological proof of God's existence.
As the Newtonian God is supposed to be omnipresent in space without being a space-filling body, so the pre-critical, Kantian mind is supposed to be omnipresent in the human body without being the body that fills that space. Only 29. See Kant (1900-- ), ND, 1: 395-396, EMB 2: 83-87. In KrV, A5711B599-AS831B66 I , Kant characterizes the argument as illusory. Later, however-as we shall see-he comes to view it as articulating a necessary demand of reason, which, however, concerns only how we must think, not what must exist.
However, this omnituclo realitatis (sum total of reality), as Kant calls it, is itself merely a stock of pOSSible thoughts oj pOSSible properties and cannot subsist without some actual basis. P This demonstration of God's existence as absolute ground enables Kant to avoid the problematic character of Newton's theology, which runs the risk of subjecting God to spatial and ultimately sensible conditions, hence of undermining the absoluteness of God required for an adequate escape from the Agrippan trilemma.